Field Notes From an Archive Review
The conservation team compared brittle paper records with the scanned catalogue and marked every phrase that needed a second reading. Several notes carried uncertain dates, while others used spelling that changed between ledgers.
Each reviewer added short comments for passages that referenced a shipment, a family name, or an earlier repair. The final review preserved the original wording and attached modern context only where the evidence was strong.
This paragraph is excluded from annotation so the demo can show non-annotatable content inside the same document.
During the second pass, overlapping annotations helped separate names, places, and dates inside a single sentence. The team could keep one broad highlight for the whole claim and narrower highlights for the details inside it.